● Why should I use PRiME-beta? What is the incentive for growers and crop advisors?
While pesticides are invaluable tools for food and fiber production, pesticide use
presents risks that must be carefully managed. Much progress has been made to reduce
pesticide risks, including many new reduced-risk products and proven mitigation
strategies. Ready access to this information will help reduce adverse impacts and
improve environmental stewardship. PRiME-beta is designed to evaluate pesticide
risks and risk reduction strategies using the best available science in an easy-to-use
format. PRiME will help growers and crop advisors make more informed choices on
practices and products that will reduce the environmental impact of high risk pesticide
applications.
The current beta version of PRiME, however, is for test purposes only.
In the coming months, our project team will add more risk indices and refine PRiME’s
data sources and risk calculations. Consequently, risk rankings are subject to change.
Users should not make changes in pest management practices based on the current
(beta) version of PRiME. Please review our
license agreement for complete terms of use.
● What is my investment to use PRiME-beta?
A Charter Membership provides full access for one year for a low introductory investment
of $24.95. Your Charter account allows you to store information about your sites
and pesticide applications and upload electronic spray records, ensuring that PRiME
serves you as efficiently as possible. Guest resources are available at no charge.
Guests may use all PRiME-beta features except for data storage and spray record
upload. Guests will need to reenter site and application information each time they
access PRiME.
● Why become a Charter Member?
Charter members have a unique opportunity to join USDA Natural Resources Conservation
Service, Unilever, US EPA Regions V and IX, General Mills and others in supporting
the development of PRiME. A Charter Membership provides full access for one year
for a low introductory investment of $24.95. Your charter account allows you to
store information about your sites and pesticide applications and upload electronic
spray records, ensuring that PRiME-beta serves you as efficiently as possible. As
a Charter Member, you will also qualify for an exclusive discount on a subscription
to PRiME’s full version.
● Can all crop producers use PRiME-beta?
Yes. PRiME-beta’s current database includes thousands of pesticide products registered
in the U.S. for use on apples, grapes, potatoes, tomatoes, strawberries and green
beans, but you can use PRiME-beta on other crops as well. Although some products
may not currently be in our database, there is often significant overlap in products
registered for similar cropping systems, and our project team continues to add products
for additional crops on an ongoing basis. Early versions of PRiME will be best suited
for specialty crops, with products for commodity crops, such as corn and soybeans,
added later this year. Also, PRiME-beta is not ideally suited for “wet” crops such
as cranberries and rice, given their unique growing environment. We will develop
PRiME for “wet” crops in 2011.
● What do PRiME-beta risk index scores mean?
PRiME-beta has been designed as a tool that allows a user to rank pesticide options
in relation to each other and assess the effectiveness of various methods for reducing
pesticide risk. For some of the indices, field results have been used to calibrate
the risk scores against actual ecological damage, but the index scores are not absolute
measures of environmental harm. Instead, PRiME-beta shows the likelihood that a
pesticide application will affect non-target organisms given the characteristics
of your farm and methods of application. See our
Guide to Interpreting Risk Index Scores for more
information.
● What is the meaning of the zero to one scale in PRiME-beta’s risk ratings?
This number represents the probability of an undesirable effect or, in the case
of chronic risk indices, the proportion of the breeding season where reproduction
is inhibited. In the example below, the avian acute index shows a risk score of
0.2. For this index, the undesirable effect is the killing of birds in and around
a crop field. Therefore, a score of 0.2 means that there is an estimated 20% chance
that the pesticide application will kill birds; a score of 0.5, for example, would
mean a 50% chance, and so on. See our
Guide to Interpreting Risk Index Scores
for a more detailed description of all of PRiME-beta’s risk indices.
● What do the yellow, amber and red zones in the risk summary signify?
PRiME-beta’s risk rating scale is divided into three categories: low, moderate and
high risk. For a given index, a risk score in the yellow zone signifies low risk;
a risk score in the amber zone signifies moderate risk, and a risk score in the
red zone signifies high risk. In the example below, the VOC emission potential,
inhalation, algae and fish indices are in the low risk zone; the small mammal, avian
reproductive and avian acute indices are in the moderate risk zone, and the aquatic
invertebrates and earthworm indices are in the high risk zone. We consider risk
index scores below a 10% chance of an undesirable effect to be in the low risk category,
where no further steps to reduce risk are needed. Realistically, 10% is within the
margin of error for our risk models. Risk index scores between 10% and 50% fall
into the moderate risk category where we recommend that you take steps to reduce
(mitigate) the risk of that application. Risk index scores above a 50% chance of
an undesirable effect fall into the high risk category, where risk mitigation is
highly recommended. See our
Guide to Interpreting Risk Index Scores for more
information.
● What happens when PRiME-beta is missing data for a product?
In some cases, PRiME-beta will not have enough data required to make a risk calculation
for a given index. A risk index could fail to calculate because we are missing the
necessary physical and chemical properties (e.g. foliar half-life) for the active
ingredient or because we are missing the necessary toxicity values for the end point
of concern. If a risk bar is present, or a number is given (e.g. 0.00, or <0.01),
then a calculation was made. In cases where no calculation is made, a risk score
may be replaced by a “pass code” or a warning. To learn more about missing data,
see our
Guide to Interpreting Risk Index Scores.
● How does PRiME-beta’s cumulative risk assessment work?
The cumulative risk assessment enables you to generate risk ratings for multiple
simultaneous applications (for example, a tank mix) such that all products are factored
into a single risk score for each index. Cumulative risk assessment can be used
to evaluate all applications for a growing season, but the assessment does not take
into account pesticide buildup over time. Along with the cumulative probability
of an adverse effect, PRiME-beta will display the number of individual applications
falling into each risk category. See our
Guide to Interpreting Risk Index Scores for more information on how the read the cumulative risk output.
● Will PRiME-beta provide a single score for all indices?
In the current (beta) version of PRiME, risk index scores are not combined into
a single score. The problem with combining all risk indices into a single score
is that decisions based on combined scores could potentially lead to unintended
and harmful risk tradeoffs. For example, if you are comparing two applications and
each has a single risk score of 50, one score might signify risk to algae, whereas
the other signifies a risk to farm workers. A single risk score might lead one to
believe that the risks of these two applications are identical when, in fact, they
are not. An informed risk management decision requires that the user know which
resources are at risk. We are currently evaluating methods of aggregation that will
reduce the likelihood of masking potentially harmful risk tradeoffs.
● Can PRiME-beta account for different pesticide application methods, e.g. granular
vs. spray?
Yes. PRiME-beta handles differences in application methods a couple different ways.
The method of application will affect a pesticide’s movement to surface water. PRiME-beta
models this movement to surface water taking into account how the pesticide is applied
as well as its likelihood to runoff or stick to the soil and how long it lasts in
the environment. PRiME-beta also uses Use Pattern Adjustment Factors (UPAFs) to
adjust risk scores when an application method is known to reduce or increase likely
exposure levels to a specific non-target organism.
● Are PRiME-beta’s risk calculations based on real impacts?
PRiME-beta has two kinds of risk index, acute and chronic. While the acute risk
indices are calibrated against field studies, the chronic indices are based on laboratory
studies. To learn more about how risk indices are calculated, see our
Guide to Interpreting Risk Index Scores.
● Is the Inhalation index risk score for persons on or off the field?
The Inhalation index calculates risk for a person present, for a significant period
of time, in an area adjacent to the field, including a residence, workshop, adjacent
field, etc. To learn more about how risk indices are calculated, see our
Guide to Interpreting Risk Index Scores.
● Does PRiME-beta take into account pesticide accumulation after multiple applications?
Pesticide accumulation refers to the buildup of pesticides in the environment resulting
from repeated applications; accumulation can occur in soil, groundwater, surface
water, plants and animal tissues. Although this refinement is possible in future
versions of PRiME, the current beta version treats each application as an independent
event.
● How can I be confident in the accuracy of the risk scores generated by PRiME-beta?
Our risk scores are generated using the best available science. PRiME’s development
team includes qualified experts from academic research, scientific consulting firms,
government agencies and non-profit organizations. PRiME-beta’s risk indices have
undergone independent scientific reviews, and we continue to publish our work in
peer reviewed, scientific journals and to seek input from a broad range of stakeholders.
● Can I import my spray records directly into my PRiME-beta account?
Yes. PRiME-beta accepts spray records from an electronic spreadsheet such as Excel.
This import feature allows you to upload multiple pesticide applications at once,
rather than entering each application individually, saving you time and effort.
Early versions of the import feature will require the data to be in a specified
format, while later versions will connect directly to popular farm data management
software.
● Will PRiME-beta warn me if I enter a pesticide application rate inconsistent with
label recommendations?
No. It is the user’s responsibility to read and follow all label instructions. PRiME-beta
will generate risk ratings based on the information entered by the user and will
not detect when an incorrect rate has been entered. You are required by law to follow
all label instructions regardless of PRiME risk outputs.
● Is the data entered into PRiME-beta secure?
Yes. We use state of the art security measures to ensure that all sensitive information
sent over the internet is protected. All user data is strictly confidential and
will not be shared with any third parties. Please review our
privacy statement
for more information.
● Does PRiME-beta generate results for the efficacy or cost of a pesticide application?
The current version of PRiME does not generate results for how well a pesticide
application will work or the cost differences between application scenarios. Accurate
data for efficacy and cost is difficult to come by and presently PRiME-beta does
not generate results for these factors.
● Will PRiME-beta suggest strategies for reducing pesticide risk?
PRiME’s “Suggested Mitigation Strategies” feature is currently under development
and will be launched in 2011. When risk level is moderate to high, PRiME will indicate
the pathways of exposure (e.g. spray drift, runoff, etc.) and suggest appropriate
measures for reducing that risk, including IPM and conservation practices. Users
will be able to select hypothetical mitigation options and compare to previous risk
ratings.